SOC Coverage

Answer for all of it. Not just the alerts you reached.

There’s a line in every SOC where the queue stops getting worked, and it moves with how many people are on shift that week. Dropzone AI erases it: every alert, every connected source, all the time, each arriving as a verdict with the reasoning attached.

Every alert and source investigated.

Comparison showing 100% of alerts investigated with Dropzone AI versus partial coverage before.

SOC Coverage

Answer for all of it. Not just the alerts you reached.

There’s a line in every SOC where the queue stops getting worked, and it moves with how many people are on shift that week. Dropzone AI erases it: every alert, every connected source, all the time, each arriving as a verdict with the reasoning attached.

Every alert and source investigated.

Comparison showing 100% of alerts investigated with Dropzone AI versus partial coverage before.

SOC Coverage

Answer for all of it. Not just the alerts you reached.

There’s a line in every SOC where the queue stops getting worked, and it moves with how many people are on shift that week. Dropzone AI erases it: every alert, every connected source, all the time, each arriving as a verdict with the reasoning attached.

Every alert and source investigated.

Comparison showing 100% of alerts investigated with Dropzone AI versus partial coverage before.

SOC Coverage

Answer for all of it. Not just the alerts you reached.

There’s a line in every SOC where the queue stops getting worked, and it moves with how many people are on shift that week. Dropzone AI erases it: every alert, every connected source, all the time, each arriving as a verdict with the reasoning attached.

Every alert and source investigated.

Comparison showing 100% of alerts investigated with Dropzone AI versus partial coverage before.

SOC Coverage

Answer for all of it. Not just the alerts you reached.

There’s a line in every SOC where the queue stops getting worked, and it moves with how many people are on shift that week. Dropzone AI erases it: every alert, every connected source, all the time, each arriving as a verdict with the reasoning attached.

Every alert and source investigated.

Comparison showing 100% of alerts investigated with Dropzone AI versus partial coverage before.

Investigation, hunting and intel, finally on the same clock.

~13

emerging threat hunts per weeks

380+

pre-built hunt packs

7.7 min

median time to verdict

Investigation, hunting and intel, finally on the same clock.

~13

emerging threat hunts per weeks

380+

pre-built hunt packs

7.7 min

median time to verdict

Investigation, hunting and intel, finally on the same clock.

~13

emerging threat hunts per weeks

380+

pre-built hunt packs

7.7 min

median time to verdict

Investigation, hunting and intel, finally on the same clock.

~13

emerging threat hunts per weeks

380+

pre-built hunt packs

7.7 min

median time to verdict

Capacity decides what gets looked at. It's arithmetic, and it has been for twenty years.

More in the queue than hours to work it, so something decides what gets opened. Usually severity, so the alerts nobody looks at are the low-severity, high-volume ones: identity, authentication, data movement. Which is also where a slow compromise sits. Hunting and threat intel hit the same wall. Neither has a deadline, both compete with a queue that’s never empty, so both become what you do with a free afternoon. Nobody decided that.

A number you can't give the board

Ask what share of last month's alerts got a real investigation. Most SOCs don't track it, and there's a reason: the number would only describe the part the team could get to anyway.

A detection library that decay quietly

Keeping a detection library healthy is a bigger job than writing one, and it’s the job with no deadline. Rules drift as the estate changes, and one that quietly stopped matching looks exactly like a quiet week.

Advisories with a shelf life

Friday’s advisory is still sitting there Wednesday, the way most of them do. By the time anyone gets to work it properly, the window it mattered in has usually moved on.

Every alert gets a real investigation

Every alert, every source you've connected, around the clock. Each one gets several hypotheses formed and tested against your own telemetry before a person ever sees it.

The library gets maintained

Triage stops consuming the week, so the library gets hours. The rules you turned down can go back on, and the ones that drifted get found by someone with time to look.

An advisory becomes a hunt the day it lands

Read in full, turned into a hunt pack checked against your environment, rather than waiting for someone to have a free afternoon

Capacity decides what gets looked at. It's arithmetic, and it has been for twenty years.

More in the queue than hours to work it, so something decides what gets opened. Usually severity, so the alerts nobody looks at are the low-severity, high-volume ones: identity, authentication, data movement. Which is also where a slow compromise sits. Hunting and threat intel hit the same wall. Neither has a deadline, both compete with a queue that’s never empty, so both become what you do with a free afternoon. Nobody decided that.

A number you can't give the board

Ask what share of last month's alerts got a real investigation. Most SOCs don't track it, and there's a reason: the number would only describe the part the team could get to anyway.

A detection library that decay quietly

Keeping a detection library healthy is a bigger job than writing one, and it’s the job with no deadline. Rules drift as the estate changes, and one that quietly stopped matching looks exactly like a quiet week.

Advisories with a shelf life

Friday’s advisory is still sitting there Wednesday, the way most of them do. By the time anyone gets to work it properly, the window it mattered in has usually moved on.

Every alert gets a real investigation

Every alert, every source you've connected, around the clock. Each one gets several hypotheses formed and tested against your own telemetry before a person ever sees it.

The library gets maintained

Triage stops consuming the week, so the library gets hours. The rules you turned down can go back on, and the ones that drifted get found by someone with time to look.

An advisory becomes a hunt the day it lands

Read in full, turned into a hunt pack checked against your environment, rather than waiting for someone to have a free afternoon

Capacity decides what gets looked at. It's arithmetic, and it has been for twenty years.

More in the queue than hours to work it, so something decides what gets opened. Usually severity, so the alerts nobody looks at are the low-severity, high-volume ones: identity, authentication, data movement. Which is also where a slow compromise sits. Hunting and threat intel hit the same wall. Neither has a deadline, both compete with a queue that’s never empty, so both become what you do with a free afternoon. Nobody decided that.

A number you can't give the board

Ask what share of last month's alerts got a real investigation. Most SOCs don't track it, and there's a reason: the number would only describe the part the team could get to anyway.

A detection library that decay quietly

Keeping a detection library healthy is a bigger job than writing one, and it’s the job with no deadline. Rules drift as the estate changes, and one that quietly stopped matching looks exactly like a quiet week.

Advisories with a shelf life

Friday’s advisory is still sitting there Wednesday, the way most of them do. By the time anyone gets to work it properly, the window it mattered in has usually moved on.

Every alert gets a real investigation

Every alert, every source you've connected, around the clock. Each one gets several hypotheses formed and tested against your own telemetry before a person ever sees it.

The library gets maintained

Triage stops consuming the week, so the library gets hours. The rules you turned down can go back on, and the ones that drifted get found by someone with time to look.

An advisory becomes a hunt the day it lands

Read in full, turned into a hunt pack checked against your environment, rather than waiting for someone to have a free afternoon

A number you can't give the board

Ask what share of last month's alerts got a real investigation. Most SOCs don't track it, and there's a reason: the number would only describe the part the team could get to anyway.

A detection library that decay quietly

Keeping a detection library healthy is a bigger job than writing one, and it’s the job with no deadline. Rules drift as the estate changes, and one that quietly stopped matching looks exactly like a quiet week.

Advisories with a shelf life

Friday’s advisory is still sitting there Wednesday, the way most of them do. By the time anyone gets to work it properly, the window it mattered in has usually moved on.

Every alert gets a real investigation

Every alert, every source you've connected, around the clock. Each one gets several hypotheses formed and tested against your own telemetry before a person ever sees it.

The library gets maintained

Triage stops consuming the week, so the library gets hours. The rules you turned down can go back on, and the ones that drifted get found by someone with time to look.

An advisory becomes a hunt the day it lands

Read in full, turned into a hunt pack checked against your environment, rather than waiting for someone to have a free afternoon

A number you can't give the board

Ask what share of last month's alerts got a real investigation. Most SOCs don't track it, and there's a reason: the number would only describe the part the team could get to anyway.

A detection library that decay quietly

Keeping a detection library healthy is a bigger job than writing one, and it’s the job with no deadline. Rules drift as the estate changes, and one that quietly stopped matching looks exactly like a quiet week.

Advisories with a shelf life

Friday’s advisory is still sitting there Wednesday, the way most of them do. By the time anyone gets to work it properly, the window it mattered in has usually moved on.

Every alert gets a real investigation

Every alert, every source you've connected, around the clock. Each one gets several hypotheses formed and tested against your own telemetry before a person ever sees it.

The library gets maintained

Triage stops consuming the week, so the library gets hours. The rules you turned down can go back on, and the ones that drifted get found by someone with time to look.

An advisory becomes a hunt the day it lands

Read in full, turned into a hunt pack checked against your environment, rather than waiting for someone to have a free afternoon

Capacity decides what gets looked at. It's arithmetic, and it has been for twenty years.

More in the queue than hours to work it, so something decides what gets opened. Usually severity, so the alerts nobody looks at are the low-severity, high-volume ones: identity, authentication, data movement. Which is also where a slow compromise sits. Hunting and threat intel hit the same wall. Neither has a deadline, both compete with a queue that’s never empty, so both become what you do with a free afternoon. Nobody decided that.

A number you can't give the board

Ask what share of last month's alerts got a real investigation. Most SOCs don't track it, and there's a reason: the number would only describe the part the team could get to anyway.

A detection library that decay quietly

Keeping a detection library healthy is a bigger job than writing one, and it’s the job with no deadline. Rules drift as the estate changes, and one that quietly stopped matching looks exactly like a quiet week.

Advisories with a shelf life

Friday’s advisory is still sitting there Wednesday, the way most of them do. By the time anyone gets to work it properly, the window it mattered in has usually moved on.

Every alert gets a real investigation

Every alert, every source you've connected, around the clock. Each one gets several hypotheses formed and tested against your own telemetry before a person ever sees it.

The library gets maintained

Triage stops consuming the week, so the library gets hours. The rules you turned down can go back on, and the ones that drifted get found by someone with time to look.

An advisory becomes a hunt the day it lands

Read in full, turned into a hunt pack checked against your environment, rather than waiting for someone to have a free afternoon

Capacity decides what gets looked at. It's arithmetic, and it has been for twenty years.

More in the queue than hours to work it, so something decides what gets opened. Usually severity, so the alerts nobody looks at are the low-severity, high-volume ones: identity, authentication, data movement. Which is also where a slow compromise sits. Hunting and threat intel hit the same wall. Neither has a deadline, both compete with a queue that’s never empty, so both become what you do with a free afternoon. Nobody decided that.

A number you can't give the board

Ask what share of last month's alerts got a real investigation. Most SOCs don't track it, and there's a reason: the number would only describe the part the team could get to anyway.

A detection library that decay quietly

Keeping a detection library healthy is a bigger job than writing one, and it’s the job with no deadline. Rules drift as the estate changes, and one that quietly stopped matching looks exactly like a quiet week.

Advisories with a shelf life

Friday’s advisory is still sitting there Wednesday, the way most of them do. By the time anyone gets to work it properly, the window it mattered in has usually moved on.

Every alert gets a real investigation

Every alert, every source you've connected, around the clock. Each one gets several hypotheses formed and tested against your own telemetry before a person ever sees it.

The library gets maintained

Triage stops consuming the week, so the library gets hours. The rules you turned down can go back on, and the ones that drifted get found by someone with time to look.

An advisory becomes a hunt the day it lands

Read in full, turned into a hunt pack checked against your environment, rather than waiting for someone to have a free afternoon

Every alert, every shift, with the reasoning attached.

Everything in the queue gets worked, and coverage doesn’t stop where your detections do. All of it runs against your own environment and the business context your team adds.

Every alert is investigated, and "every" is literal

Your AI SOC Analyst forms a hypothesis, collects the data to test it, and pulls more where the picture isn’t settled, until it reaches a verdict. Four are possible: Malicious, Suspicious, Benign, Inconclusive. That last one matters, nothing gets pushed into a verdict it hasn’t earned to clear the queue.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Evidence is the reasoning, not a summary of it

Every source touched and every query run, raw response alongside the processed one, the actions taken and the questions that drove them. The record runs from the alert arriving to the conclusion being approved. None of it is a summary written afterwards. Your team can take any query, run it in your own tools, and see whether the answer holds up.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

The alerts you suppressed become viable again

Once alert volume stops costing analyst hours, the reason you tuned that noisy rule down in the first place quietly goes away. You still have ingest filters. You're just reaching for them because you don't need the signal now, rather than because you can't keep up with it.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Find what never set off an alert

AI Threat Hunter runs hypothesis-driven hunts on a schedule, not on spare cycles. AI Threat Intel Analyst reads advisories in full and turns the CVEs, IOCs and TTPs into a hunt pack mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and checked against your environment. A hunt that finds no attacker still comes back with misconfigurations, shadow IT, the box nobody patched.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Every alert, every shift, with the reasoning attached.

Everything in the queue gets worked, and coverage doesn’t stop where your detections do. All of it runs against your own environment and the business context your team adds.

Every alert is investigated, and "every" is literal

Your AI SOC Analyst forms a hypothesis, collects the data to test it, and pulls more where the picture isn’t settled, until it reaches a verdict. Four are possible: Malicious, Suspicious, Benign, Inconclusive. That last one matters, nothing gets pushed into a verdict it hasn’t earned to clear the queue.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Evidence is the reasoning, not a summary of it

Every source touched and every query run, raw response alongside the processed one, the actions taken and the questions that drove them. The record runs from the alert arriving to the conclusion being approved. None of it is a summary written afterwards. Your team can take any query, run it in your own tools, and see whether the answer holds up.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

The alerts you suppressed become viable again

Once alert volume stops costing analyst hours, the reason you tuned that noisy rule down in the first place quietly goes away. You still have ingest filters. You're just reaching for them because you don't need the signal now, rather than because you can't keep up with it.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Find what never set off an alert

AI Threat Hunter runs hypothesis-driven hunts on a schedule, not on spare cycles. AI Threat Intel Analyst reads advisories in full and turns the CVEs, IOCs and TTPs into a hunt pack mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and checked against your environment. A hunt that finds no attacker still comes back with misconfigurations, shadow IT, the box nobody patched.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Every alert, every shift, with the reasoning attached.

Everything in the queue gets worked, and coverage doesn’t stop where your detections do. All of it runs against your own environment and the business context your team adds.

Every alert is investigated, and "every" is literal

Your AI SOC Analyst forms a hypothesis, collects the data to test it, and pulls more where the picture isn’t settled, until it reaches a verdict. Four are possible: Malicious, Suspicious, Benign, Inconclusive. That last one matters, nothing gets pushed into a verdict it hasn’t earned to clear the queue.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Evidence is the reasoning, not a summary of it

Every source touched and every query run, raw response alongside the processed one, the actions taken and the questions that drove them. The record runs from the alert arriving to the conclusion being approved. None of it is a summary written afterwards. Your team can take any query, run it in your own tools, and see whether the answer holds up.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

The alerts you suppressed become viable again

Once alert volume stops costing analyst hours, the reason you tuned that noisy rule down in the first place quietly goes away. You still have ingest filters. You're just reaching for them because you don't need the signal now, rather than because you can't keep up with it.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Find what never set off an alert

AI Threat Hunter runs hypothesis-driven hunts on a schedule, not on spare cycles. AI Threat Intel Analyst reads advisories in full and turns the CVEs, IOCs and TTPs into a hunt pack mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and checked against your environment. A hunt that finds no attacker still comes back with misconfigurations, shadow IT, the box nobody patched.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Every alert, every shift, with the reasoning attached.

Everything in the queue gets worked, and coverage doesn’t stop where your detections do. All of it runs against your own environment and the business context your team adds.

Every alert is investigated, and "every" is literal

Your AI SOC Analyst forms a hypothesis, collects the data to test it, and pulls more where the picture isn’t settled, until it reaches a verdict. Four are possible: Malicious, Suspicious, Benign, Inconclusive. That last one matters, nothing gets pushed into a verdict it hasn’t earned to clear the queue.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Evidence is the reasoning, not a summary of it

Every source touched and every query run, raw response alongside the processed one, the actions taken and the questions that drove them. The record runs from the alert arriving to the conclusion being approved. None of it is a summary written afterwards. Your team can take any query, run it in your own tools, and see whether the answer holds up.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

The alerts you suppressed become viable again

Once alert volume stops costing analyst hours, the reason you tuned that noisy rule down in the first place quietly goes away. You still have ingest filters. You're just reaching for them because you don't need the signal now, rather than because you can't keep up with it.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Find what never set off an alert

AI Threat Hunter runs hypothesis-driven hunts on a schedule, not on spare cycles. AI Threat Intel Analyst reads advisories in full and turns the CVEs, IOCs and TTPs into a hunt pack mapped to MITRE ATT&CK and checked against your environment. A hunt that finds no attacker still comes back with misconfigurations, shadow IT, the box nobody patched.

White dotted grid forming a curved wave across the background

Coverage you can answer for

The bounds are yours to set

You decide what the agents handle alone and what always comes to a person. Widen it as the evidence earns it.

Every verdict shows its work

Reasoning, queries, and sources arrive with the finding, so reviewing it is a decision, not a second investigation.

Built at the regulated bar

FedRAMP High authorized, EU data residency, and an audit trail that still answers “what ran, and why” months later.

Proven in production

Real security work across 300+ environments since 2023: Fortune 500, Global 100, federal agencies.

Coverage you can answer for

The bounds are yours to set

You decide what the agents handle alone and what always comes to a person. Widen it as the evidence earns it.

Every verdict shows its work

Reasoning, queries, and sources arrive with the finding, so reviewing it is a decision, not a second investigation.

Built at the regulated bar

FedRAMP High authorized, EU data residency, and an audit trail that still answers “what ran, and why” months later.

Proven in production

Real security work across 300+ environments since 2023: Fortune 500, Global 100, federal agencies.

Coverage you can answer for

The bounds are yours to set

You decide what the agents handle alone and what always comes to a person. Widen it as the evidence earns it.

Every verdict shows its work

Reasoning, queries, and sources arrive with the finding, so reviewing it is a decision, not a second investigation.

Built at the regulated bar

FedRAMP High authorized, EU data residency, and an audit trail that still answers “what ran, and why” months later.

Proven in production

Real security work across 300+ environments since 2023: Fortune 500, Global 100, federal agencies.

Coverage you can answer for

The bounds are yours to set

You decide what the agents handle alone and what always comes to a person. Widen it as the evidence earns it.

Every verdict shows its work

Reasoning, queries, and sources arrive with the finding, so reviewing it is a decision, not a second investigation.

Built at the regulated bar

FedRAMP High authorized, EU data residency, and an audit trail that still answers “what ran, and why” months later.

Proven in production

Real security work across 300+ environments since 2023: Fortune 500, Global 100, federal agencies.

Frequently asked questions

[

01

]

Does Dropzone AI investigate every alert, or only the high-severity ones?

[

02

]

Does investigating every alert add work for our analysts?

[

03

]

How do our analysts check an AI conclusion?

[

04

]

How do we measure SOC coverage?

[

05

]

We already have an MDR. Where does this fit?

[

06

]

How long does it take to connect to our stack?

Frequently asked questions

[

01

]

Does Dropzone AI investigate every alert, or only the high-severity ones?

[

02

]

Does investigating every alert add work for our analysts?

[

03

]

How do our analysts check an AI conclusion?

[

04

]

How do we measure SOC coverage?

[

05

]

We already have an MDR. Where does this fit?

[

06

]

How long does it take to connect to our stack?

Frequently asked questions

[

01

]

Does Dropzone AI investigate every alert, or only the high-severity ones?

[

02

]

Does investigating every alert add work for our analysts?

[

03

]

How do our analysts check an AI conclusion?

[

04

]

How do we measure SOC coverage?

[

05

]

We already have an MDR. Where does this fit?

[

06

]

How long does it take to connect to our stack?

Frequently asked questions

[

01

]

Does Dropzone AI investigate every alert, or only the high-severity ones?

[

02

]

Does investigating every alert add work for our analysts?

[

03

]

How do our analysts check an AI conclusion?

[

04

]

How do we measure SOC coverage?

[

05

]

We already have an MDR. Where does this fit?

[

06

]

How long does it take to connect to our stack?

Glowing violet geometric panels on a dark call-to-action background

See the team work on your own client alerts.

Glowing violet geometric panels on a dark call-to-action background

See the team work on your own client alerts.

Glowing violet geometric panels on a dark call-to-action background

See the team work on your own client alerts.

Glowing violet geometric panels on a dark call-to-action background

See the team work on your own client alerts.